|Title||Revolutionary land use change in the 21st century: Is (rangeland) science relevant?|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2012|
|Authors||Herrick JE, Brown J., Bestelmeyer B, Andrews S.S., Baldi G., Davies J., Duniway M.C., Havstad K, Karl JW, Karlen D.L., Peters DC, Quinton J.N, Riginos C., Shaver P.L., Steinaker D, Twomlow S.|
|Journal||Rangeland Ecology and Management|
|ARIS Log Number||274223|
|Keywords||degradation, economics, food security, resilience, soil depth, sustainable land management|
Rapidly increasing demand for food, fiber and fuel together with new technologies and the mobility of global capital are driving revolutionary changes in land use throughout the world. Efforts to increase land productivity include conversion of millions of hectares of rangelands to crop production, including many marginal lands with low resistance and resilience to degradation. Sustaining the productivity of these lands requires careful land use planning and innovative management systems. Historically, this responsibility has been left to agronomists and others with expertise in crop production. In this paper, we argue that the revolutionary land use changes necessary to support national and global food security potentially make rangeland science more relevant now than ever. Maintaining and increasing relevance will require a revolutionary change in range science from a discipline that focuses on a particular land use or land cover to one that addresses the challenge of managing all lands that, at one time, were considered to be marginal for crop production. We propose four strategies to increase the relevance of rangeland science to global land management: (1) expand our awareness and understanding of local to global economic, social, and technological trends in order to anticipate and identify drivers and patterns of conversion, (2) emphasize empirical studies and modeling that anticipate the biophysical (ecosystem services) and societal consequences of large-scale changes in land cover and use, (3) significantly increase communication and collaboration with the disciplines and sectors of society currently responsible for managing the new land uses, and (4) develop and adopt a dynamic and flexible resilience-based land classification system and data-supported conceptual models (e.g., State and Transition models) that represent (a) all lands, irrespective of use and (b) the consequences of land conversion to various uses, instead of changes in state or condition that are focused on a single land use.