Comparison of soil-aggregate crushing-energy meters

TitleComparison of soil-aggregate crushing-energy meters
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsPi H., Huggins D.R., Webb N., Sharratt B.S.
JournalAeolian Research
Volume42
Issue100559
Date Published01/10/2020
ARIS Log Number366087
KeywordsAbrasion, Binding energy, Dry aggregate stability, dust emission, Particle cohesion, wind erosion
Abstract

Dry aggregate stability (DAS) is an important factor influencing soil wind erosion, dust emission and crop production. Historically and to the present, DAS has been determined using a horizontal- or vertical-plate crushing meter (Soil-Aggregate Crushing-Energy Meter, hereafter SACEM). The intent of this paper was to compare the performance of horizontal-plate SACEM with a commercial penetrometer (Mohr Digi-Test, hereafter MDT). The performance of both instruments was tested on aggregates collected from various soil types, crop rotations, soil amendments, and tillage systems across the inland Pacific Northwest United States (iPNW). Results indicated no consistently significant difference in DAS measured by the MDT and SACEM. However, there was evidence that SACEM under-estimated or MDT over-estimated DAS by 74 to 368% in measuring the stability of strong aggregates (DAS > 3 J kg-1). Both instruments measured higher DAS for no-tillage summer fallow, winter wheat-summer fallow (WW-SF) rotations, and no green manure treatments compared with other tillage practices, oilseed rotations, and green manure treatments. The SACEM that has historically been used in measuring soil DAS can be replaced by the commercial penetrometer (MDT). Nonetheless, differences in the performance of instruments in measuring the stability of strong aggregates poses risks.

URLfiles/bibliography/20-002.pdf
DOI10.1016/j.aeolia.2019.100559