Aggregate mesquite litter mass following soil-litter mixing and decomposition in a semi-arid grassland from 2010-2012

Data Access: 

Unrestricted

Dataset status: 

Study number: 

301

Data set ID: 

210301002

Date range: 

2010-04-01 to 2012-10-31

Original investigator: 

Dan Hewins

Data contact: 

Abstract: 

Mesquite litter mass loss from decomposition associated with soil-litter mixing.

 

Mesquite litter mass loss from decomposition associated with soil-litter mixing.

 

Decomposition models typically under-predict decomposition relative to observed rates in drylands. This discrepancy indicates a significant gap in our mechanistic understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in these systems. Recent research suggests that certain drivers of decomposition that are often not explicitly incorporated into models (e.g., photodegradation and soil-litter mixing; SLM) may be important in drylands, and their exclusion may, in part, be responsible for model under-predictions. To assess the role of SLM, litterbags were deployed in the Chihuahuan Desert and interrelationships between vegetation structure, SLM, and rates of decomposition were quantified. Vegetation structure was manipulated to simulate losses of grass cover from livestock grazing and shrub encroachment. I hypothesized that reductions in grass cover would promote SLM and accelerate mass loss by improving conditions for microbial decomposition.  

 

For more see: Hewins, D. B., S. R. Archer, G. S. Okin, R. L. McCulley, and H. L. Throop. 2013. Soil-litter mixing accelerates decomposition in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Ecosystems 16:183-195

Data download: 

Methods: 

Methods of recording

Data sheets

Methodology

 Litterbags (10 x 10 cm) were constructed using UV-resistant fiberglass window screen (0.8 x 1.0 mm openings; New York Wire Company, Mount Wolf, PA, USA) to ensure litterbag longevity under field conditions.  Naturally senescing honey mesquite (P. glandulosa) litter was collected on 19 October 2007 at the JRN and ‘air dried’ at 30 degrees C for 48 hours. Drying at this temperature should not affect litter chemistry, as leaves experienced greater temperatures during the growing season. Litterbags were filled with 2 g of leaflets; this mass filled litterbags with minimal leaflet overlap. For every 10 litterbags filled, a 2 g sample was dried at 60 degrees C to establish a wet-dry mass relationship.

Litterbags were deployed on 19 and 20 April 2008, a time corresponding to the annual peak in mean monthly wind speed (Wainwright 2006). Litterbags were placed along transect lines at locations of 5, 25, and 45 m downwind from the upwind edge (hereafter ‘fetch length’) of removal subplot borders. Transects at fetch lengths of 55, 75 and 95 m were established in response subplots (Fig. 2.1). Litterbags were spaced at distances approximating the average interplant gap distance (range = 92 to 892 mm, depending on the subplot) and were fixed to the soil surface with 10 cm long steel staples.  To avoid wake effects on soil transport (Okin 2008), litterbag placements were adjusted as needed to ensure that no bags were within 5 m of an upwind shrub. One litterbag from each fetch length in each subplot was randomly designated for collection at 0, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-deployment.

2.2.3 Laboratory Processing and Analyses

Litterbag contents (litter + accumulated soil) were separated using a 1 mm mesh sieve. Litter was then manually dusted using small brushes to remove additional soil from leaflets. The brushed litter was frozen at -80 degrees C for 48 hours, lyophilized for 48 hours, weighed, and then ground to a fine powder using a ball mill (8000D Mixer/Mill, Spex Certiprep, Metuchen, NJ, USA). Subsamples of litter were combusted at 550 degrees C for 6 hours to determine the inorganic matter content (% ash). Mass loss and litter C and N content (elemental analyzer; ECS 4010, Costech Analytical Technologies, Valencia, CA, USA) are expressed on an ash-free basis.  The % ash was also used as a conservative index of soil accumulation that accounts only for soil adhering to litter surfaces after sieving and brushing (see Throop and Archer 2007).

 

Correction factors are used when calculating mass remaining (estimates of: transport loss, litter water content, initial ash, etc.,), so at times, especially at the 0 month collection, the % mass remaining may be a few %  greater or less than 100%. Once decomposition begins in earnest these become negligible.

 

For more details see:

Hewins, D. B., S. R. Archer, G. S. Okin, R. L. McCulley, and H. L. Throop. 2013. Soil-litter mixing accelerates decomposition in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Ecosystems 16:183-195

Quality assurance: 

data entry program validates entries for species code and acceptable range for cover.

Additional information: 

Site Location

JER Pasture 11A Okin exclosures (see Study 228)

Maintenance: 

Frequency of measurement

Month interval from time of sample installation in field: 0, 1, 6, 12, 24, 30

Long-term dataset: 

Signature dataset: 

LTER Core Area(s): 

Data category: 

LTER VI Proposal Category: 

DOI: 

10.6073/pasta/a2d6c247a7e23c9838d53af41ae7ee9b